Thank you Dr Clare for analysing what are crazy figures. For me it highlights how few of us said NO. Maybe 13m in the UK? That leaves a huge vulnerable population facing an uncertain unhealthy future with too few of us left to do the caring while surviving ourselves. 😞
My local once thriving market towns are already ghost towns with boarded up shops, out of town and online shopping plus high business rates. A small taste of what's to come as population inevitably crashes from these poisons.
In the first plot labeled "Absolute number of deaths in 2021 by age", you seem to have included all deaths up to the end of the dataset and not just deaths up to the end of 2021. For example for dose 1 in ages 45-49, your maximum number of weekly deaths is 1588, but it should've been 534 if you would've only included deaths up to the end of 2021 (or more accurately up to the last week that starts in 2021, which includes the first two days of 2022).
Don't feel bad about it. It is has gone over my head also. Maybe I am a bit thick. I will trust in Clare's analysis that something is very rotten in the data. What it is specifically escapes me. The concept of vaccinated versus healthy vaccinated confuses me.
Your next plot shows that ages 20 to 24 had about 108 deaths in December 2020. However I think the number should be 103 in the request for England or 111 in the request for England and Wales, so your plot doesn't seem to match either request. And similarly in June 2021 your plot has about 124 deaths, but there's 122 deaths in the request for England and 132 for England and Wales.
Thank you Dr Clare for analysing what are crazy figures. For me it highlights how few of us said NO. Maybe 13m in the UK? That leaves a huge vulnerable population facing an uncertain unhealthy future with too few of us left to do the caring while surviving ourselves. 😞
My local once thriving market towns are already ghost towns with boarded up shops, out of town and online shopping plus high business rates. A small taste of what's to come as population inevitably crashes from these poisons.
So what Clare is saying in a very polite way is this
They are lying
We know they are lying
They know that we know they are lying
Yet they continue to lie.
🇦🇺💉On GMOs, and a conflict of interest? A disturbing clip: https://open.substack.com/pub/julesonthebeach/p/gmo-case-a-video?r=20pd6j&utm_medium=ios
In the first plot labeled "Absolute number of deaths in 2021 by age", you seem to have included all deaths up to the end of the dataset and not just deaths up to the end of 2021. For example for dose 1 in ages 45-49, your maximum number of weekly deaths is 1588, but it should've been 534 if you would've only included deaths up to the end of 2021 (or more accurately up to the last week that starts in 2021, which includes the first two days of 2022).
Sorry, I cannot combine the written text with (the info in) the graphs. Maybe it is over my head.
Don't feel bad about it. It is has gone over my head also. Maybe I am a bit thick. I will trust in Clare's analysis that something is very rotten in the data. What it is specifically escapes me. The concept of vaccinated versus healthy vaccinated confuses me.
In the sentence where you linked to "data on deaths by date of occurrence from ONS", you linked to the ONS user request for England and Wales, and not the other request for England only: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/adhocs/1343dailydeathsbydateofoccurrence1stjune2014to31stmay2023bysingleyearofageengland.
Your next plot shows that ages 20 to 24 had about 108 deaths in December 2020. However I think the number should be 103 in the request for England or 111 in the request for England and Wales, so your plot doesn't seem to match either request. And similarly in June 2021 your plot has about 124 deaths, but there's 122 deaths in the request for England and 132 for England and Wales.
Thank you.
I will make corrections.
“How DO the healthy. . .
Thanks!