I feel so bereft of agency. Helpless. Impotent. Throwing lifelines to drowning people which are ignored, while the anvil throwers are celebrated by the zeitgeist. It’s terribly dispiriting. I can only imagine that for those whose focus is even more intense, this sentiment must be orders of magnitude worse. Please accept my small token of written gratitude.
This is a novel virus and a novel vaccine that is not even remotely tested or comparable to the standard operating procedures. Over 30 years of research on mRND brought us nothing to market, yet they sold it to a very large number of naive people who were told this will save your life and allow your freedoms back. All lies and misinformation, this whole pandemic was planned for years, it’s a profit driven conspiracy with depopulation and sterilizing results. We have to reduce our carbon emissions and increase our technology to replace humans.
Claire I’m currently looking at ONS death by vax status covering April 2021 to May 2023.
Your article went into depth on the skewing numbers and agree I think the ONS are now captured. But even the figures they are producing aren’t shining a good light on the vaccine.
I’m simplifying and I know there will someone ready to disagree but….
I first was looking at All Cause deaths and bearing in mind the proportion of vax to unvax changed over the two years but you would expect if the vax was safe it would have no affect on either groups mortality proportional to each other . And in the beginning if the virus was as deadly as they claimed the unvaccinated should be disproportionately dying in higher numbers.
This clearly isn’t the case according to their ‘Table 2’ sheet.
As an example, Ideally you would adjust the numbers of the unvaccinated to be proportional to the vaxxed.
According to the uk dashboard end of 2022 approx 90% were vaccinated and 10% not. So every unvaccinated death should be multiplied by 9. Hell I’m feeling generous lets times it by 10. So if 10 unvaccinated died then there should be 100 vaxxed died also! Crude but you get the jist.
For the younger groups this was balanced but the older the worse it became.
November 2022 343 unvaccinated died in the 80-89 age group. 13,616 died in the vaccinated group with 10,965 deaths in 4th booster cohort. There should have been approx 3,430 deaths in the vaxxed 🤷🏻♂️!!
The other significant revelation I found was interesting! Covid deaths! According to the current UK covid dashboard there have been 194,509 deaths with covid on the death certificate “deaths involving covid” according to this spreadsheet only 56,782 Deaths involving covid over the two years.
Off the top of my head there officially was 74,500 deaths involving covid 2020-21 and 64,700 in 2021-22. Something isn’t adding up!!🤔🧐
It is not now, never was, and never will be a vaccine. It is a highly-dangerous genetic 'therapy', aka a bioweapon, aka a 'vaccine'.
And anyway, the data is flawed from the get-go, as they count someone as 'unvaccinated' for no less than 2 wks post jab, and single-dosed for the same period after the 2nd jab etc.
The vast majority of short-term deaths occur within the two-week period, during which the data will count the 'vaccinated' deaths as' unvaccinated' and make the jab look much safer than it was during the roll-out.
Thank you for this because it's not going away..... “Permanent Pandemics and Vaccines”. Michel Chossudovsky
“This declaration aims to form a global pandemic authority that has a range of disturbing powers, such as the ability to enforce lockdowns, push for universal vaccination and censor what it deems “misinformation.”
I'm not sure like at what point this mythology started that they told people heard immunity was the goal but that may have been the political and public health rhetoric but that certainly was not the rhetoric coming out of the CEOs of these vaccine companies, Bill Gates or even fauci because I remember the interviews at the end of 2020 when these people were telling everybody on MSNBC on CNN Etc that it was not going to keep you from getting the virus it was just going to keep you from developing the disease and going to the hospital. So while political figures in public health officials may have lied or been confused about this the people that were really selling this to the public the vaccine manufacturers and the public health Superstars were telling everyone the truth and everyone ignored it or they didn't see that information. They did not pivot and those interviews are still out there on YouTube and other platforms. I'm not picking on people but unfortunately this speaks to how checked out cognitively and information wise the American public is when they don't even know this happening or they're not aware of it and they just continue to repeat the same talking points that are fairly inaccurate at times.
Clare: TY. I just heard your interview with Dr. Campbell — excellent. FYI, I'm a physicist who has been quite involved with COVID. Here is my website "C19Science.info". I also have a substack, which is about Critical Thinking. Several of my posts are about COVID — like this "https://criticallythinking.substack.com/p/critically-thinking-about-a-key-covid". Feel free to email me: "aaprjohn" at "northnet" dot "org". — john droz, jr.
It is very sad that these numbers are no longer supplied. I can only presume that people were getting too close to the truth. The ONS have definitely fallen over with the new excess death calculation.
The paper isn't up to date vis the latest ONS publication through May 2023, I expect an extension of the horror story we currently experience to continue.
You say: "Vaccination should have no impact on non-covid mortality." This seems to be a critical assumption in your article.
However, there is evidence that many diseases can result from or be exacerbated by Covid. These aren't necessary recorded as "involving Covid" on death certificates. That being the case, an effective vaccine will have an impact in reducing these diseases relative to the unvaccinated. The "involving Covid" numbers are useful in a qualitative way to identify the timing and duration of an outbreak, but they cannot be used as a quantitative measure of the impact of Covid.
It is best to stick with the all-cause numbers for quantitative analysis and avoid Covid/non-Covid numbers for that purpose.
I feel so bereft of agency. Helpless. Impotent. Throwing lifelines to drowning people which are ignored, while the anvil throwers are celebrated by the zeitgeist. It’s terribly dispiriting. I can only imagine that for those whose focus is even more intense, this sentiment must be orders of magnitude worse. Please accept my small token of written gratitude.
Somehow we must reverse that ONS decision: it is unconscionable. Unreasonable. And deeply suspicious.
This is a novel virus and a novel vaccine that is not even remotely tested or comparable to the standard operating procedures. Over 30 years of research on mRND brought us nothing to market, yet they sold it to a very large number of naive people who were told this will save your life and allow your freedoms back. All lies and misinformation, this whole pandemic was planned for years, it’s a profit driven conspiracy with depopulation and sterilizing results. We have to reduce our carbon emissions and increase our technology to replace humans.
Claire I’m currently looking at ONS death by vax status covering April 2021 to May 2023.
Your article went into depth on the skewing numbers and agree I think the ONS are now captured. But even the figures they are producing aren’t shining a good light on the vaccine.
I’m simplifying and I know there will someone ready to disagree but….
I first was looking at All Cause deaths and bearing in mind the proportion of vax to unvax changed over the two years but you would expect if the vax was safe it would have no affect on either groups mortality proportional to each other . And in the beginning if the virus was as deadly as they claimed the unvaccinated should be disproportionately dying in higher numbers.
This clearly isn’t the case according to their ‘Table 2’ sheet.
As an example, Ideally you would adjust the numbers of the unvaccinated to be proportional to the vaxxed.
According to the uk dashboard end of 2022 approx 90% were vaccinated and 10% not. So every unvaccinated death should be multiplied by 9. Hell I’m feeling generous lets times it by 10. So if 10 unvaccinated died then there should be 100 vaxxed died also! Crude but you get the jist.
For the younger groups this was balanced but the older the worse it became.
November 2022 343 unvaccinated died in the 80-89 age group. 13,616 died in the vaccinated group with 10,965 deaths in 4th booster cohort. There should have been approx 3,430 deaths in the vaxxed 🤷🏻♂️!!
The other significant revelation I found was interesting! Covid deaths! According to the current UK covid dashboard there have been 194,509 deaths with covid on the death certificate “deaths involving covid” according to this spreadsheet only 56,782 Deaths involving covid over the two years.
Off the top of my head there officially was 74,500 deaths involving covid 2020-21 and 64,700 in 2021-22. Something isn’t adding up!!🤔🧐
Assuming there is no difference in non-COVID mortality between the two cohorts of course?!
It is not now, never was, and never will be a vaccine. It is a highly-dangerous genetic 'therapy', aka a bioweapon, aka a 'vaccine'.
And anyway, the data is flawed from the get-go, as they count someone as 'unvaccinated' for no less than 2 wks post jab, and single-dosed for the same period after the 2nd jab etc.
The vast majority of short-term deaths occur within the two-week period, during which the data will count the 'vaccinated' deaths as' unvaccinated' and make the jab look much safer than it was during the roll-out.
Thank you for this because it's not going away..... “Permanent Pandemics and Vaccines”. Michel Chossudovsky
“This declaration aims to form a global pandemic authority that has a range of disturbing powers, such as the ability to enforce lockdowns, push for universal vaccination and censor what it deems “misinformation.”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-permanent-pandemics-and-vaccines-michel-chossudovsky/5833872?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
And we let them get away with hiding the data.
I'm not sure like at what point this mythology started that they told people heard immunity was the goal but that may have been the political and public health rhetoric but that certainly was not the rhetoric coming out of the CEOs of these vaccine companies, Bill Gates or even fauci because I remember the interviews at the end of 2020 when these people were telling everybody on MSNBC on CNN Etc that it was not going to keep you from getting the virus it was just going to keep you from developing the disease and going to the hospital. So while political figures in public health officials may have lied or been confused about this the people that were really selling this to the public the vaccine manufacturers and the public health Superstars were telling everyone the truth and everyone ignored it or they didn't see that information. They did not pivot and those interviews are still out there on YouTube and other platforms. I'm not picking on people but unfortunately this speaks to how checked out cognitively and information wise the American public is when they don't even know this happening or they're not aware of it and they just continue to repeat the same talking points that are fairly inaccurate at times.
Clare: TY. I just heard your interview with Dr. Campbell — excellent. FYI, I'm a physicist who has been quite involved with COVID. Here is my website "C19Science.info". I also have a substack, which is about Critical Thinking. Several of my posts are about COVID — like this "https://criticallythinking.substack.com/p/critically-thinking-about-a-key-covid". Feel free to email me: "aaprjohn" at "northnet" dot "org". — john droz, jr.
Thanks for your excellent work! I'm not sure if the ONS data release is more light or heat producing. https://ulflorr.substack.com/p/lunatic-results-from-british-death
It is very sad that these numbers are no longer supplied. I can only presume that people were getting too close to the truth. The ONS have definitely fallen over with the new excess death calculation.
Hi Joel, Thanks for this link. I've left a couple of comments there, and this link :
https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/UK Cause of Death/Report V-Damage Analysis - Cardiovascular 15-44 – V3.pdf
The paper isn't up to date vis the latest ONS publication through May 2023, I expect an extension of the horror story we currently experience to continue.
So... the m[iracle]RNA toxic spew jabs are just working as expected!
https://postimg.cc/7GtmSf5D
Culling the the herds of MMS/3i's in order for Them to try to secure Their Future.
You say: "Vaccination should have no impact on non-covid mortality." This seems to be a critical assumption in your article.
However, there is evidence that many diseases can result from or be exacerbated by Covid. These aren't necessary recorded as "involving Covid" on death certificates. That being the case, an effective vaccine will have an impact in reducing these diseases relative to the unvaccinated. The "involving Covid" numbers are useful in a qualitative way to identify the timing and duration of an outbreak, but they cannot be used as a quantitative measure of the impact of Covid.
It is best to stick with the all-cause numbers for quantitative analysis and avoid Covid/non-Covid numbers for that purpose.
If you read it again you are in my comment!