The judgement has now been made in the case we brought against the Information Commissioner’s Office, after it failed to require the UKHSA to release data on people who died in the period following vaccination against Covid 19.
Strange isn't it, that we're not allowed to see evidence that would, if what we're still being told about their safety is true, prove that the vaccines are safe beyond doubt. For the "authorities" the stakes are just too high...
Thank you and those who supported you for taking this case forward. Unfortunately, it seems to have confirmed the complete capture of the UK state regards COnVID-19 and the so called vaccines. Their response is the antithesis of scientific inquiry, and their secrecy confirmation that they have something to hide.
EDIT - Slight correction needed to the post - its Vahe Nafilyan at the ONS...
The amount of blood on his hands and the judges, we truly do have no justice in the UK, for him to be given an OBE just confirms the corruption, only for Nonce's and Ponce's
I am interested in the motives of Vahe Nafilyan, is he just bureaucrat in the purest sense? What does he see his job as - obstruction for the sake of it?
Thanks for your efforts- It might feel like they were in vain and that this was a defeat. Neither is true. The more questions asked the more truth we can see. Government institutions are on their last legs. Good riddance.
Britain is a fascist state. Our institutions are totally captured by the jab scammers. The tribunal’s reasons for upholding classification of anonymised data are unbelievable, but not surprising. From Christmas 2020, when the first jabbers piled into UK care homes, and the very people (in fact, the only people) at risk from the supposed virus promptly began dropping dead in large numbers - 25,000 excess deaths of age-frail and infirm people over the following 3 months - an ordinance has been in force that no adverse data about the jabs must come out. When Dr Clare Craig and I made FOIAs in April 2021 to MPs, to the NHS, and to the ONS, all of them came back saying no data was available on how many of the recently deceased were covid vaccinated. Someone had ordered jab-status omitted from death certificates. How was such an order enforced, except by alliance between government and corporate interest for the exploitation of the public. That is fascism.
Technically it isn't really fascism - thats just a label. It is state/corporate control - an unholy and secretive conspiracy to deceive, obfuscate, lie, and conceal safety data that is of massive public interest - this is not the exclusive preserve of fascism, communism, or any other 'ism' - but the closest it comes to in my books is 'Orwellism' - or 'Totalitarianism' - its pure 1984.
Is it possible the judge believed the arguments he upheld for denying release of anonymised data? Not really. So why did he do it? The extent of pro-vaccine, not just pro-covid vaccine, brainwashing, is that the almost universal belief in our society is that anyone bringing out data which contradicts 'safe and effective' vaccine narratives must be wicked. You find evidence of the viewpoint that data cannot be allowed if it undermines vaccines every time you suggest that such data might exist. People do not want to hear it, assume you must be deranged or wicked for suggesting it. At the very least they assume you are simply wrong.
And it is more than that: it is wrong of the data itself to exist. That is the Orwellian element.
Well, not really actually. Communism is state and corporations entwined as well, so you can't actually claim that's fascism. Fascism has got certain cultural artefacts, like for example, symbolic stuff and male superiority and oppressing ethnic minorities. Communism probably masks itself slightly better, but corporatism doesn't actually care. They're just great at crushing ordinary people, regardless. It doesn't actually contain those same kind of cultural iconic elements. Corporatism is essentially just the big boots stamping on the face. That's it. Doesn't matter. Its power against lack of power that's all.
amazing work Clare, no idea how you are staying to calm and not got mental with this maze of BS thrown at you. Are you kidding me 'mental stress caused by that data'??? What about the mental stress caused by gov. measures in 2020,21 and 22?? This is just nuts. If there was nothing to hide they would simply release it. Hence it is crystal clear they know what they did and now they are hiding it to not get prosecuted. Something expected from a gov like N. Korea or GDR. Humanity is decline, here is another proof for it :(
Can't get access to data in the public interest. Shame but it's where we're at. It's just as bad if not worse in Canada. No transparency, no democracy.
Thank you Clare. You are one of the many stars among a lot of bastards which make up the majority of the medical profession in the ground and in the organizations that stipulate what the useful idiots can do!
How frustrating. I cannot understand the reasoning behind this decision. It feels utterly non-transparent and makes me even more suspicious that there is a problem which is being covered up.
Thank you Dr Craig for you sterling efforts in an attempt to bring this information into the public domain. Obviously they have much to hide. What about the mental health of those relatives of elderly and disabled residents of care homes that were euthanised rather then treated and given the "died of Covid" diagnosis without a doctor even being present.
The only conclusion I can make, considering the effort they went to, in order that you wouldn't get the data requested, is that it would have provided evidence so damaging to the UKHSA and their sponsors there would be a public outcry!
Which is perhaps the whole point. When the organisations are obviously hiding data that they don't want people to know, it should mean to the wise that they are testing the IQ of the masses.
Find SOMEONE in the mai stream media who is sympathetic to the info and get them on it. If not MSM, then Piers. If not Piers, then Tucker and Candace. I believe Dr. Drew has had you on already. Go again! What about someone on the left? Ari Weiss? Young Turks/anna kasparian? There HAS to be some vpices on the left who also care about transparency and medical harms?
1) Jimmy Dore, excellent US comedian who awoke to the scam early on, unlike UK comedians of about that age (e.g. Mark Steel, Alexei Sayle)
2) Del Bigtree
3) Neil Oliver?
1-3 aren't quite MSM but the UK MSM is 'difficult'. As the (awake) Lab. MP Graham Stringer said, the best or rather least bad 'COVID' coverage was in the Mail and Torygraph. They allowed more dissenting opinions. Good luck finding someone.
Or, a final thought ... the Joe Rogan Experience? Very large audiences. Definitely controlled by TPTB but then so is Tucker Carlson. Younger age groups may get more 'news' from him than from the British Brainwashing Corpn.
Strange isn't it, that we're not allowed to see evidence that would, if what we're still being told about their safety is true, prove that the vaccines are safe beyond doubt. For the "authorities" the stakes are just too high...
Not so strange indeed rather typical of the lying, cheating, evil incompetents - but it will all come out in the end!
The government doesn't want the proles to know they're being culled.
There are still knives in the UK, which means that the proles could get sporty with their better.
They can't EVER let this info out in the US; we have gunz, and it could get scary sporty here.
They would be impaled on the stakes that is why.
Thank you and those who supported you for taking this case forward. Unfortunately, it seems to have confirmed the complete capture of the UK state regards COnVID-19 and the so called vaccines. Their response is the antithesis of scientific inquiry, and their secrecy confirmation that they have something to hide.
EDIT - Slight correction needed to the post - its Vahe Nafilyan at the ONS...
Oh dear. That's a bad mistake.
Freudian slip? Nefarion?
People might be distressed if they learned what the psychopaths and useless elites perpetrated on the population.
5 + years on they really should have worked it out by now.
unfortunately not .
The amount of blood on his hands and the judges, we truly do have no justice in the UK, for him to be given an OBE just confirms the corruption, only for Nonce's and Ponce's
And he is French with Armenian background I believe. How does someone like him get to work in such an important position.
I am interested in the motives of Vahe Nafilyan, is he just bureaucrat in the purest sense? What does he see his job as - obstruction for the sake of it?
Must be pretty damning data!
Thanks for your efforts- It might feel like they were in vain and that this was a defeat. Neither is true. The more questions asked the more truth we can see. Government institutions are on their last legs. Good riddance.
I think that's right.
Britain is a fascist state. Our institutions are totally captured by the jab scammers. The tribunal’s reasons for upholding classification of anonymised data are unbelievable, but not surprising. From Christmas 2020, when the first jabbers piled into UK care homes, and the very people (in fact, the only people) at risk from the supposed virus promptly began dropping dead in large numbers - 25,000 excess deaths of age-frail and infirm people over the following 3 months - an ordinance has been in force that no adverse data about the jabs must come out. When Dr Clare Craig and I made FOIAs in April 2021 to MPs, to the NHS, and to the ONS, all of them came back saying no data was available on how many of the recently deceased were covid vaccinated. Someone had ordered jab-status omitted from death certificates. How was such an order enforced, except by alliance between government and corporate interest for the exploitation of the public. That is fascism.
Technically it isn't really fascism - thats just a label. It is state/corporate control - an unholy and secretive conspiracy to deceive, obfuscate, lie, and conceal safety data that is of massive public interest - this is not the exclusive preserve of fascism, communism, or any other 'ism' - but the closest it comes to in my books is 'Orwellism' - or 'Totalitarianism' - its pure 1984.
Is it possible the judge believed the arguments he upheld for denying release of anonymised data? Not really. So why did he do it? The extent of pro-vaccine, not just pro-covid vaccine, brainwashing, is that the almost universal belief in our society is that anyone bringing out data which contradicts 'safe and effective' vaccine narratives must be wicked. You find evidence of the viewpoint that data cannot be allowed if it undermines vaccines every time you suggest that such data might exist. People do not want to hear it, assume you must be deranged or wicked for suggesting it. At the very least they assume you are simply wrong.
And it is more than that: it is wrong of the data itself to exist. That is the Orwellian element.
That is fascism - state and corporations intertwined.
Well, not really actually. Communism is state and corporations entwined as well, so you can't actually claim that's fascism. Fascism has got certain cultural artefacts, like for example, symbolic stuff and male superiority and oppressing ethnic minorities. Communism probably masks itself slightly better, but corporatism doesn't actually care. They're just great at crushing ordinary people, regardless. It doesn't actually contain those same kind of cultural iconic elements. Corporatism is essentially just the big boots stamping on the face. That's it. Doesn't matter. Its power against lack of power that's all.
Different cheeks of the same arse.
amazing work Clare, no idea how you are staying to calm and not got mental with this maze of BS thrown at you. Are you kidding me 'mental stress caused by that data'??? What about the mental stress caused by gov. measures in 2020,21 and 22?? This is just nuts. If there was nothing to hide they would simply release it. Hence it is crystal clear they know what they did and now they are hiding it to not get prosecuted. Something expected from a gov like N. Korea or GDR. Humanity is decline, here is another proof for it :(
Can't get access to data in the public interest. Shame but it's where we're at. It's just as bad if not worse in Canada. No transparency, no democracy.
Thank you Clare. You are one of the many stars among a lot of bastards which make up the majority of the medical profession in the ground and in the organizations that stipulate what the useful idiots can do!
Thank you Clare.
How frustrating. I cannot understand the reasoning behind this decision. It feels utterly non-transparent and makes me even more suspicious that there is a problem which is being covered up.
There is no reason- Other than cover up.
It is the ongoing IQ test of the populace. This is the 'Why are we refusing to release data because it might upset people?' question.
Hopefully more people will get the right answer this time.
If not they will have to retake the test.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-great-covid-retest?utm_source=publication-search
Of course Stupid 20 is still very prevalent having morphed to Long Stupid so we may be in for a long wait.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/long-stupid?utm_source=publication-search
We have at least had our main point proven that the information isn't free for people to make up their own opinion from.
Tough it seams pretty resonable that anyone that is now dead from the shoot would like their case to get out.
Maybe next time they chose to mass force vaccinate people they could include that part in the agreement.
🔲 if I die from the vaccine my data will be released for scientific analysis!
Just a thought. Would it help if we all write to the UKHSA about this? Is there any journalist interested in this story?
Put my money where my pen is…..and have written and sent a letter to the UKHSA:
https://open.substack.com/pub/mfvh/p/ukhsa-foi-request-release-anonymised?r=ylgqf&utm_medium=ios
Thank you Dr Craig for you sterling efforts in an attempt to bring this information into the public domain. Obviously they have much to hide. What about the mental health of those relatives of elderly and disabled residents of care homes that were euthanised rather then treated and given the "died of Covid" diagnosis without a doctor even being present.
The only conclusion I can make, considering the effort they went to, in order that you wouldn't get the data requested, is that it would have provided evidence so damaging to the UKHSA and their sponsors there would be a public outcry!
Ironically, we asked for so little that I do not think that would be the case.
However, the way they handled it is bound to give that impression.
Surely the fact they went to so much trouble to deny access to ‘so little’ must raise suspicion they are terrified of something being revealed?
Or it is a test of the publics IQ.
Which is perhaps the whole point. When the organisations are obviously hiding data that they don't want people to know, it should mean to the wise that they are testing the IQ of the masses.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-great-covid-retest?utm_source=publication-search
Find SOMEONE in the mai stream media who is sympathetic to the info and get them on it. If not MSM, then Piers. If not Piers, then Tucker and Candace. I believe Dr. Drew has had you on already. Go again! What about someone on the left? Ari Weiss? Young Turks/anna kasparian? There HAS to be some vpices on the left who also care about transparency and medical harms?
Piers was pushing the damn thing and villifying anyone who didn't want to take it. Has he changed his mind now? Has he admitted he was wrong?
1) Jimmy Dore, excellent US comedian who awoke to the scam early on, unlike UK comedians of about that age (e.g. Mark Steel, Alexei Sayle)
2) Del Bigtree
3) Neil Oliver?
1-3 aren't quite MSM but the UK MSM is 'difficult'. As the (awake) Lab. MP Graham Stringer said, the best or rather least bad 'COVID' coverage was in the Mail and Torygraph. They allowed more dissenting opinions. Good luck finding someone.
Or, a final thought ... the Joe Rogan Experience? Very large audiences. Definitely controlled by TPTB but then so is Tucker Carlson. Younger age groups may get more 'news' from him than from the British Brainwashing Corpn.
Thank you Clare. I think you should leave Britain. It’s not a safe place anymore. I left UK as a child. Without understanding. I was fortunate
Where to?
That is the question! It seems that nowhere is safe anymore.
It is tragic.
Flagstaff Arizona or Sedona Az
America is best choice. You could ask for asylum the way you have been treated by the uk government
Disgraceful, Keep trying, using a different question, please. This is a matter of huge public interest.